04/06/2009

Not Forgotten

The great Tiananmen taboo - Ma Jian, The Guardian, 2 June 2009
It is 20 years since students and lecturers filled Tiananmen Square, demanding democracy, only to be crushed by tanks and fired on by the Chinese army. Banned novelist Ma Jian, who was there at the protests, returned to Beijing to find a country desperate to erase all memories of the thousands of innocent lives lost

====================

Bodies of dead civilians lie among mangled bicycles near Beijing's Tiananmen Square, 4 June 1989. Photograph: AP

Two thousand years ago, contemplating the relentless flow of time, Confucius gazed down at a river and sighed, "What passes is just like this, never ceasing day or night ..." In China, time can feel both frozen and unstoppable at the same time. The Tiananmen massacre that 20 years ago ravaged Beijing, killed thousands of unarmed citizens, and altered the lives of millions, seems now to be locked in the 20th century, forgotten or ignored, as China continues to hurtle blindly towards its future.

The amnesia to which China has succumbed is not the result of natural memory-loss but of state-enforced erasure. China's Communist regime tolerates no mention of the massacre. But Tiananmen Square, and other sites connected with the events of 1989, still remain charged with memory. When the written and spoken word is censored, the urban landscape becomes a nation's only physical link to the past.

I left Beijing in 1987, shortly before my books were banned there, but have returned continually. In 1989, I was on Tiananmen Square with the students, living in their makeshift tents and joining their jubilant singing of the Internationale. In the two decades since, each time that I have gone back, visions from those days seem to return with increasing persistence.

During the Beijing Olympics last August, I took my now five-year-old son to the square. On our journey there, our movements were observed by the CCTV cameras in the lift of our apartment block and outside the front gate of our compound, by the listening devices in our taxi, by the armed police who lined the streets and by the security guards who frisked us before finally allowing us on to Tiananmen. We emerged from the underpass and stepped on to the square. Apart from the crowds of policemen, the plain-clothes officers (instantly identifiable by their dark sunglasses and striped Airtex shirts) and the gaudy flower displays, the concrete-paved square, the size of nine football fields, was almost deserted.

In spring 1989, the square had been taken over by Beijing students and civilians who were mounting the largest peaceful protest in history. They were pressing for dialogue with their Communist leaders, and ultimately for freedom and democracy. The packed square became the city's pulsing heart; the police had vanished. This was a benevolent form of anarchy - noble, joyous, and surprisingly orderly.

My son ran to the spot where 20 years ago the students had erected a huge polystyrene replica of the Statue of Liberty. He looked northwards to Tiananmen Gate, the entrance to the Forbidden City where China's emperors used to live. In 1949, Mao stood on the gate and declared the founding of the People's Republic. Now the gate's blood-red walls were covered in scaffolding and green gauze. At politically sensitive times these walls are invariably covered for "important repair work", ensuring that the public won't get near enough to daub them with subversive slogans. The only bit of the gate that tourists could now photograph was the portrait of Chairman Mao over the central arch.

My son stared up at the tyrant's pink, pudgy face and asked me who he was.

"Mao Zedong," I replied.

"Is he dead now?" he said, sweat dripping down his cheeks.

"He died years ago, his body is lying in that big building over there," I explained, pointing to the grey, concrete mausoleum behind us. My son turned round and ran off towards an ice-cream stall, and I thought of how, in 1989, I too had run across the square in the sweltering heat, with a bag of ice-lollies in my backpack, which I then handed out to my writer-friends who had marched to the square from the Lu Xun Writers' Academy, calling for freedom of expression and an end to government corruption. I gave them the victory sign as they paraded past. More than a million people were on the square that day. The sky was just as blue then, but instead of the scent of flowers and green turf, the air was filled with the sour smell of sweat, rotting refuse and exuberant cries of protest.

As my son peered into the vendor's ice box, I glanced at the bridge over the Jinshui moat that skirts Tiananmen Gate. It was now lined with police. They were there to prevent the suicide jumps of anti-government petitioners. Five years ago, a Beijinger named Ye Guoqiang had attempted just such a fatal jump as a protest against his recent and forceful eviction from his home in order to make way for an Olympic Games construction project. He was sentenced to two years in prison for embarrassing the state. "If you want to kill yourself," the judge told him, "at least do it in the privacy of your own home, not beneath the Chairman's nose." Citizens can allow themselves to be shot dead by the army below Mao's portrait, but not to commit suicide there.

Opposite the Museum of Chinese History on the east side of the square, I took a photograph of my son standing in front of a garish maroon, yellow and orange potted flower display. The slogan above read: One World, One Dream. In early May 1989, during the students' mass hunger strike, I had told my friend that if the army came to the square and turned their guns on us, I would take her straight into the museum for cover. "You think they'd turn their guns on us?" she laughed. "Are you crazy?" She was wearing a straw hat at the time, with the words "Sorrow! Joy!" printed on the front. Like almost everyone else, she couldn't believe that the People's Liberation Army would shoot innocent civilians.

On May 28 1989, my brother had an accident in my hometown of Qingdao and fell into a coma. I immediately left Beijing to look after him, so I didn't witness the massacre of 4 June. (Perhaps if I had, I would never have been able to write about it.) My friend Li Lanju, the head of a Hong Kong student association, told me that in the early hours of 4 June she too had been sitting here in front of the museum. She saw PLA soldiers in green helmets pour out from inside and line up on the steps in front. A boy of about 15 ran towards the soldiers with a rock in his hand and shouted, "You just shot my brother! I want to avenge his death!" Li Lanju rushed over to him and pulled him back. But a few minutes later, a man ran past carrying the same boy in his arms. He was dead now, his face covered in blood. The Museum of Chinese History holds no records of those events that happened below its front steps.

I walked over to my son and bought him a panda-shaped ice cream on a stick. (Back in London, a month later, his mother and I were horrified to learn that the dairy products we'd been feeding him and his three-year-old sister had been contaminated with kidney-stone inducing melamine. The Chinese government had known that unscrupulous farmers had been adulterating milk to increase profit margins, but had suppressed all news of the scandal to avoid spoiling their Olympics propaganda pageant.)

We continued south past Mao's mausoleum and my thoughts returned again to 1989, when a student in my tent told me how he longed to muster a few friends, charge into the mausoleum, drag out Mao's corpse and throw it into the Jinshui river. He said that as long as Mao's embalmed body remains in the square, China will have no peace.

Feeling tired and dispirited, I took my son's hand and led him across the road to the Qianmen district. In 1989, I'd often scarpered off to its crowded, bustling lanes in search of a quick bowl of noodles. Back then, stall holders would hand out free drinks and bread rolls to hungry protesters. I heard that after the students were driven out of the square on 4 June, street vendors came out with baskets of trainers to give to protesters who'd lost their shoes in the scrum. Today, the place was almost unrecognisable. In the run-up to the Olympics, the Ming Dynasty buildings along the main street, with their beautiful stone carvings and ornate wooden eaves, had been demolished and replaced by soulless, modern replicas of their former selves. I stood with my son amid the kitsch while locals wandered around in bewilderment, cameras in hand, now reduced to tourists in their own backstreets.

After a while, the sense of alienation from the past becomes suffocating and makes one long to reconnect with old friends. When I arrived in Beijing a few weeks before the Olympics, the secret police summoned me to the Sheraton Hotel and, over coffee and cakes, told me very politely not to speak in public, meet with any foreign journalists and especially to stay away from politically sensitive people such as Liu Xiaobo and Zhou Duo - two of the four intellectuals who went on hunger strike in sympathy with the students during the last days of the democracy movement. Zhou Duo, a former economics professor at Beijing University, is an old friend of mine. He is a quiet, scholarly man, with a love of philosophy and classical music. In 1989 he became swept up in the democracy movement after the more flamboyant and charismatic essayist, Liu Xiaobo, declared him to be the most important intellectual of our generation. Zhou Duo had never taken much interest in politics before, so I was surprised to hear that he had joined the hunger strike. In the late hours of 3 June he and the Taiwanese rock star, Hou Dejian, went to negotiate with the army. While the students huddled in terror below the Monument to the People's Heroes, he implored the army to let the students retreat from the square in safety. His quiet, diplomatic demeanour no doubt saved thousands of lives.

Unlike Liu Xiaobo who, having spent several years in prison, is now in detention again for signing a charter last year calling for political reform, Zhou Duo has disappeared from public life. He hasn't been able to work or be published since 1989 and is under constant police surveillance. He regrets his involvement in the protests and the loss of his career. Having found God, he manages to hold small services in his heavily monitored flat in the outskirts of Beijing, and spends most of his time drawing up models for China's political future. Few will ever see them. We spoke briefly on his bugged phone before the Olympics, but I didn't dare suggest a meeting.

In February of this year I returned to China to research my next book. The authorities know about the novels of mine that have been published in the west, including the latest one, Beijing Coma, about a student shot in Tiananmen Square, but so far have allowed me to return. They continue to search me at customs, confiscate my documents and monitor my movements, but no doubt realise that as long as they deny me a voice in China, I can't do much harm. Although my next book has nothing to do with Tiananmen, a few days after my arrival in February I found myself involuntarily drawn back to that vast open space. I went there by taxi. The square was deserted and carpeted in snow. The emerald conifers along its perimeter drew one's gaze skyward. I wound down the window to take a photograph, but before I had time to press the shutter, the driver barked, "Close that window! There's a new rule, didn't you know? All taxi windows must be kept shut when driving past Tiananmen Square. It's been designated a 'politically sensitive area'."

This year is one of many important anniversaries in China, including the 60th of the founding of the People's Republic and the 20th of the Tiananmen massacre. The government is more on guard than ever. I wound up the window, glanced out at the square and recalled a multitude of raised hands, banners and flags. The cries of a million silenced protesters echoed in my mind's ear, saying more to me than anything my eyes could now see.

Beijing Coma took me 10 years to finish. The first few years, I wrote very little. A single recurrent image was blocking my progress: a man lying naked on an iron bed, a sparrow perched on his arm, his chest illuminated by a cold beam of light. Those 10 years were a struggle to prove to myself the power and meaning of that single beam of light.

"Why is it that men are so good at turning their heaven into a hell?" I muttered to myself as I closed my eyes.

The taxi driver looked out of his window and said, "That snow is nothing. You should see how much has fallen back in our village ..."

"I don't want to get out at the square any more," I said. "I've changed my mind. Please turn round and take me to Tongxian."

I had a sudden wish to visit the artist and photographer Chen Guang. The photographs he had taken many years ago of himself surrounded by naked women or having sex with a prostitute had been crude expressions of an inner rage. But recently, he had completed a series of oil paintings of the Tiananmen massacre, and had exhibited them on the internet.

I wanted to see them.

Chen Guang's flat in Tongxian is in an anonymous modern block. In the middle of his stark room was a plastic bucket filled with his cigarette stubs; the white walls were hung with green swirling paintings of tanks, helmeted soldiers and flattened tents.

He gave me a glass of water and confessed that in 1989 he had joined the army. He was just 17. Within a few months of conscription, his regiment - number 62 - was sent to Beijing to help quash the student movement. On 3 June his fellow soldiers received orders to disguise themselves as civilians, make their way independently to the Great Hall of the People on the west side of the square, and await the signal to drive the students out.

"There were 7,000 of us," he told me, lighting a new cigarette from the glowing stub of his last one, "and I was given the job of transporting our 4,000 assault rifles to the Great Hall. I dressed myself up as a student and loaded the guns on to a public bus the army had appropriated. As the driver edged through the packed crowds of students on Changan Avenue, I was terrified that they might jump up and spot the rifles stacked along the floor, so I leaned out and gave them a cheerful victory sign. When we reached the back yard of the Great Hall and locked the gates, I spent two hours unloading the guns, armful by armful. They were brand new. By the end, I was drenched in oil."

I'd never heard a soldier give a first-hand account of the crackdown. He took a deep drag from his cigarette and continued, his eyes beginning to redden: "Each soldier was given a loaded rifle and told to stand in line. Most of us were young boys from the villages. We had hardly eaten for days. We were weak and terrified, convinced we were going die. Some guys shat themselves, others were trembling so much that they inadvertently fired their guns and injured fellow soldiers.

"At 12 midnight on 4 June the doors of the Great Hall were swung open. It was chaos outside. Special forces in camouflage were brandishing bayonets and driving out the students still left in the square. Nearby, a small group kicked a student to the ground and hit his skull with their rifle butts. I heard machine-gun fire in the distance, and saw the Goddess of Democracy being rammed by a tank and topple to the ground ...

"I clutched my rifle but didn't know where to point it. I was ordered to help clean the square and burn all evidence. I walked across the swath of flattened tents, blankets, sandals and leaflets, and picked up two journals and one long plait of black hair tied at the bottom with a plastic band. I guessed that some girl must have cut it off in despair before the army arrived ..."

I asked Chen Guang what was his most vivid memory of those days. He said, "After we sealed off central Beijing, we could go everywhere, places we'd never usually get to see. I remember wandering into the Zhongnanhai compound. All the government leaders had abandoned their villas. Their pet cats and dogs were left to starve outside the front doors ... I remember that, and other little details. But when I close my eyes and think back on those days, what I see first is the colour green, a nightmarish swirling green of helmets and tanks."

I told him that although I wasn't in Beijing during the crackdown, I too pictured a terrifying green, the sea of dehumanising khaki that kills and maims, when I came to describe those days in my book. I imagined how at dawn on 4 June, even the rising sun was stained green.

I asked him why he'd decided to talk about this now. "It's the 20th anniversary this year," he said. "I think it's about time. Anyway, I can't hold these nightmares inside me any longer." He is one of the few artists to have dared confront Tiananmen Square head-on. The day I met him, his internet exhibition was closed by the censors, just three days after going online.

The Chinese have made a faustian pact with the government, agreeing to forsake demands for political and intellectual freedom in exchange for more material comfort. They live prosperous lives in which any expression of pain is forbidden. When I talk to young Chinese about 1989, I am invariably accused of spreading false rumours and being a traitor to my nation; when I bring up the subject with my old friends, most of them laugh scornfully, as if those events are now irrelevant. But I know that behind this show of derision or apathy lies real fear. Everyone knows that attempts to break the Tiananmen taboo can still destroy a person's life and the lives of their families. The authorities, for their part, may have a monopoly of the nation's resources, but they can never fully control the nation's soul, and every day they live in terror that the intricate stack of lies they have constructed will collapse.

Xidan Book Store, a five-minute walk down Changan Avenue from the Zhongnanhai government compound, is the largest bookshop in Asia. A few days after meeting Chen Guang, I went there to buy a Chinese translation of WG Sebald's Austerlitz. Like the protagonist, I too am always struggling to find out how many memories a human life needs. This five-floor bookshop sells 100,000 books a day. A huge poster of smiling President Obama is displayed close to the main entrance. Inside you can buy translations of the latest scientific or economic tomes, and books charting China's 5,000-year history, but you will not find a word about the Tiananmen massacre, or any accurate accounts of the other tragedies that the Communists have inflicted on China since 1949. These missing chapters of the nation's history weaken the power of every other Chinese text in the shop.

My mobile phone rang. I had arranged a meeting at the bookshop with Liu Hua, a Tiananmen survivor and son of a Beijing University professor. I glanced outside the window and knew at once that it was him. He was the only person in the crowd to have only one arm.

We walked together down Changan Avenue. A cold wind was blowing and the snow on the pavements had been shovelled towards a line of holly trees. The ancient red walls of the Zhongnanhai compound were glimmering in the evening sun. We reached the Liubukou intersection. A few years ago I'd stood here and taken photographs as part of my research for Beijing Coma. At that time, the gap between the eyewitness accounts I'd heard of the carnage that took place at this intersection in 1989 and the mundane reality before my eyes could not be closed without an effort of the imagination. Now, with Liu Hua right beside me, the present scene was instantly merged with the past. He had come on the dawn of 4 June with two young students.

"It happened right here," he told me, "just by these white railings. A tank charged down Changan Avenue, and sprayed tear gas into the air. There was a big crowd of us. We were coughing and choking. We rushed on to the pavement, and I was squashed back against these railings. A girl dropped to her knees. I was grasping the railings with one hand to stop myself falling and with the other I offered her a handkerchief and told her to use it as a mask. Just as I was leaning over to hand it to her, another tank roared up and careered into us. Thirteen people were crushed to death but I only lost my arm. The tank commander knew exactly what he was doing." He stared down at the patch of asphalt at his feet and then glanced nervously at the police vans parked on the other side of the road. It was rush hour; cars and taxis were streaming past us.

What a terrifying experience, I said, gripping the white railings.

"Yes, it was," he replied quite calmly. "But I wasn't truly afraid until I saw Deng Xiaoping on television, telling the martial law troops: 'Foreigners say that we opened fire, and that I admit, but to claim that army tanks drove over unarmed citizens, that is a disgraceful slur.' My scalp tightened. I was a living witness to the truth. What if one day they came to get me? ... For two years I never dared go out at night, I never spoke about what happened. Policemen came to interrogate me almost every day, but none of us ever mentioned the tanks. Every anniversary of 4 June, the police would come to my house with pillows and mattresses and sleep on my bedroom floor. Just to stop me speaking to foreign journalists."

As the sun began to set, we retreated into a restaurant. I stared out at the darkening walls of the Zhongnanhai compound and thought of the government leaders inside sitting down for a family meal in their sumptuous villas, their cats and dogs scampering around their feet.

Liu Hua turned to me and said, "Those bloody Communists! What right did they have to take my arm from me? If they don't apologise for the crackdown and offer justice for the victims, I'll take them to the courts!"

"Be sure to keep all your evidence and medical records safe," I said. "The day of reckoning is bound to come." I'm always surprised by how much faith the Chinese place in the legal system. In a country that has no rule of law, our only weapon in the fight for justice is the strength of our convictions.

Without these witnesses, we would become more and more distanced from the atrocity. In just 20 years, the Tiananmen generation that inspired people across the world to rise up against tyrannies has faded from view. School teachers, parents, newsreaders and armies of censors have collaborated in numbing a generation. It is left to brave survivors including Liu Hua, Chen Guang, and many others such as Ding Zilin, founder of the "Tiananmen Mothers" support group, to drag the dead back from oblivion and fight for truth.

Not all of those who died on 4 June did so unknowingly. Some chose deliberately to walk towards the rifles. As the bullets were flying towards them, possibly the one thought in their minds was: "This is the darkest moment; afterwards the light will come." The unfree bodies chose to fall so that millions of others could stand up freely again and trample on the injustices of the past. The only point of self-sacrifice is to force one's oppressors to live with the burden of guilt.

I think of my brother who 20 years ago fell into a coma. His wife and children abandoned him long ago. Today, he is able to eat, drink and sleep, but has no emotions or self-respect. He can't speak, but he can sit in front of a television show and laugh himself to tears. Or he can stare at the ceiling for hours on end. He has no control over his life. He is like the Chinese people.

And yet, something extraordinary happened the last time I visited him. I often give him a pen and paper and wait to see what he draws. Sometimes it's just boxes and crosses; sometimes he'll write my name or the name of his first girlfriend. But this time, he drew a picture of a horse galloping across an open field. Although the lines were shaky, they were more expressive than any I could have drawn. For a moment, I saw a faint beam of light on his chest, and I knew that there was still hope.

© Ma Jian, May 2009. Translation by Flora Drew.

21/02/2008

Mr. Ching Cheong Release Press Conference Statement "I never spied."

Awaiting a Democratic Hong Kong

I am listening to RTHK Radio 1 in Hong Kong streaming and they just discussed Mr. Ching Cheong's press conference and so far he's thanking everyone for his release.

-----
They are playing part of his statement.

(I was translating real time with the feed, so not exact but very very close)

"After thanking everyone, I just want to say some simple things about my situation.

Number 1: I have never done anything to hurt the country or its security. I have no shame and regret, and I honestly say I deserved the out pouring of support by the public without shame in my heart.

I have never spied on China. I have never had any intentions of spying on my country. I have never intended to hurt the country's security. I have never touched any classified documents and never given classified information to Taiwan.

To me the country's security is very important to me personally. I take the idea of spying very seriously. It's not something I would consider. It is the complete opposite of my personal belief.

As I said in court. Since university graduation every major decision I have made is for the best of the country. When this situation happened, I first thought of what was important for this country's security before myself, my own safety. Which is why I handed over my computer. This showed I have nothing to hide and did not have any question and fear.



Today is the 30th Anniversary of the opening up of China. Mr. Ching Cheong hopes that China will be more open in democratic and human rights issue.

Ching Cheong a Journalist Jailed without Proof, is Freed.

Wikipedia: Ching Cheong

06/02/2008

Mr. Ching Chong Released..

A Hong Kong journalist who was jailed in mainland China on spying charges has been released after serving less than half a five-year sentence. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7227695.stm

10/08/2007

Glutter.org Supports Free Speech in China..

Just a short note for the KCRW listeners who may have come to the blog when they heard my donation read over the airwaves. Right now the blog is more geared towards my personal discovery in LA, although there are many political articles in the blog as well. I meant to write more or add the old posts up, but my internet is down at the moment, so please come back sometime.

As for those not in California or the US. KCRW is a public radio station in the US, and they do rely on fund raising drive to keep it on air. Last week I made a donation and they asked me if they could thank me on air. I didn't really need to have my name read on air, and decided that I rather use my 3 second sound bite for something more useful, which of course is to remind people that the issues of free speech in China is still contencious.

So what they read instead was, "Glutter.org supporting Free Speech in China."

Say what you may about the fact a public radio station in a country needs donation rather than being completely supported by the government like the BBC or RTHK is, but for not too much money, I was able to get an idea to a huge geographic spread and a lot of different people.

I am currently using my neighbour's email at this moment, so I shall get back on line at some other time.

Yan

04/07/2007

Listening to Martin Lee in the Quiet of America

I heard Martin Lee on the radio yesterday. I sat in the parked car in hot LA sun to listen to the whole interview. It struck me that in the quiet of America, there is no Chinese Propaganda. There is no hoopla about the reunification, nothing exploding in the sky to commemorate the special day, no national glory -only the reasons why the Hong Kong legislators do not have power, how we got 62% of the votes yet only 40% of the seats. How they can vote on governmental bills but not policy. How in order to ensure Hong Kong gets to keep it's freedom is through universal suffrage.

It was strange -I never heard those words out of context of what was going on around me. Hong Kong felt so small, fitted in with another hundreds of new stories that circulate through the NPR (National Public Radio) though the months I have been here. It is not front and center. Just another story of social justice around the world, in between global warming stories of Polynesia, mental health issues of returning US soldiers, women trying to make a business in Africa. My home seems small, when it used to feel like the biggest city in the world.

In my pottery class, there is a man from Tel Aviv, my teacher is Armenian who came to America during the Soviet times, a program by one of the Jewish centers to help Jews leave communist countries. We each have our stories of where home is, what is going on there, and the struggles of the people left behind.

It all seems very far away, not immediate but bombs do go off, rights get taken away, and people are very poor and electricity isn't always there. But it doesn't compute completely, because we're all sitting in a quiet room making pottery.

I think that's what America does to you. It's so big, even in a city like LA, we all own our house, we have our very small lives, and we live it. We're thinking of getting a dog, we're talking about how we might have a family one day, we're getting shade trees from LA county for free because it will reduce electricity use, as it will keep the house cool.

But sometimes I think of Hong Kong, and democracy. I think how strange that every time I sit in a room here, if I say that "I think Hong Kong people should get to rule themselves, I think that Chinese people should have democracy." No one, practically no one will disagree. And it's not really out of ignorance, it's not because president Bush feels that the country should spread the tenants of American government to the rest of the world that makes most people feel that way.

They feel that way because they live the benefits of a stable government every day. Many many people in LA comes from somewhere that is politically unstable. Where regimes changes, and people fight. Here they feel empowered to do something if they don't like the policy. They can lobby their congress representatives, write letters, and vote -if they choose to, they can also do absolutely nothing and still reap the benefits of being in America.

I have been going around saying "Free speech is not political, free speech is about getting to live every day life. It's about being able to explore the options and talking to people if they want about whatever that comes to mind."

We joke about California succeeding from the United states all the time. We are the world's eighth biggest economy, 30 cents of our federal tax dollars goes out of state to other places, every time the federal taxes comes into our lives, I give some money to the government and I don't know where it goes. I would like to think it goes to museums and schools, but who knows. And with the extra 30 cents maybe my nephews can have health care, and the lady down the street can have health care, and every body can have health care.

And the nice thing is, no one is accusing us of being unpatriotic, the FBI is not tapping my phone, this blog is not going to be banned in the United States, coz we talk about maybe California would be better off if it was it's own country. We're not buying guns and building up a military to fight the federal government, we're just talking about it.

But if you're in Hong Kong and you say Hong Kong should have universal suffrage, if we talk about being it's own country. That's being revolutionary, it's being radical, that's not being part of the "harmonious society." My blog is still banned in China, I probably won't be visiting for a good long while, and really no one in Hong Kong is looking to depose anyone, to take power from someone with anything but a legal and peaceful way.

My aunt woke up the other morning because Hu Jin Tao came to Hong Kong and she wanted to see his speech. i really didn't want to, and it took me a while to realize I have a hard time listenning to people who I don't know how they got to power.

I tried to work out how Hu Jin Tao came to power outside of the fact he worked up the party and Jiang Zimen liked him. I wondered if he had to depose anyone, did he get rid of someone in a back handed way to get where he is. I only know the official story and I don't have much faith in that. There is no one who will come out and discuss the unsavory things about Hu Jin Tao.

I don't know how the leaders in China really got to power and I never will.

I don't know if the stories of how they are doing a good job, how they are fair and good to be real or just propaganda.

I wonder if the vote of no confidence Blair had to take could possible happen so publicly in China without him going under house arrest, even if just to make sure he stays out of the way so he and his supporter can't engineer a coup to regain power.

I wonder how it is that China has never had an exchange of leaders who don't agree without blood, imprisonment, war or arrest.

A long time ago, before my grandmother died, she pointed to Bill Clinton shaking hands with George Bush the original as the democrats took over the white house and said, "Look at that, they are shaking hands... that would never happen in China."

I think maybe one day.

Maybe when you're so far away from home, you can actually think things that you cannot when you are there. You can think, I am not being counter-revolutionary, I am not being radical. I am not asking to depose the Chinese government. I just want the leaders to shake hands when they exchange power even if they don't agree. How bad can that be? You think that is a normal want, that people deserve to have a say, deserve to live in peace and not fear major changes.

I feel that what I believe in is no longer anything ridiculous or asking too much. I don't even think it's worth that much that I need to say. It's like the quiet makes things clearer, and you end up not shouting so loud. You just believe and hope and live your life.

03/07/2007

July First Democratic Protest

Awaiting a Democratic Hong Kong.

My friend Edwin Lee made this video for SCMP.com

07/06/2007

Relaunching Glutter

As I wait for the webfeed to come in and talk in the conference, I thought I would do something I had meant to for a good year or so. Which is to republish the old articles in the former version of Glutter and put it on the Reporters Without Borders Servers. I took them off line a while back because I wanted to just keep certain posts that was of relevance and the delete the ones that were not so interesting.. but never had the time. I figure this is probably the best time to do it, best time to relaunch the blog as it will co-inside with the launch of Irrepressible.info campaign of Amnesty International. I hope the campaign will put Internet Repression back in the public consciousness, and maybe people would find the old articles interesting as well.

That is really the great things about NGOs working towards raising profiles on issues, it doesn't just make people aware but remind those of us who have worked on the issues that there is still a lot of work to do.

I am about to go on soon....

28/03/2007

Seeing 800 as it is.

Awaiting a Democratic Hong Kong

For a few weeks, I thought it was great that we actually had someone running against Donald Tsang. I thought well, a process has started. I thought maybe with pressure our new Chief Executive will put out a blue print of when Hong Kong will get suffrage. I thought it was a good thing that the election results matched the public polling. And then I walked up a hill this morning laden with groceries and I thought, EIGHT HUNDRED?

EIGHT FLIPPING HUNDRED special interest people get to vote for the leader of our home of nearly SEVEN MILLION PEOPLE? And they get to call is an ELECTION?

Not really.

They might as well send someone all the way from China like the British did because I think somehow I can stomach that better. At least there is no smoke screen. There isn't a spin they can put on it to cover Hong Kong people's eyes. They can't actually pretend that it's an election of any sort and that Hong Kong people actually have a say in the matter.

It's kinda a joke isn't it?

It reminds me of a movie set where everything looks just so right, but once you walk into it a little deeper, it's all just plywood. But if you spend long enough in the set and don't walk out. You can settle quite well and sit on the couch.

There must be something better than pretending. There must be something better than listenning to all the talk and accepting it. Even if it doesn't happen. Even if one decides that it's better to be part of China. That we are one country and we have to be part of the central government. It's still better to see that the last elections is a charade than believe in it. One doesn't have to want democracy or want universal suffrage or want political change, but we still have to see it as what it is. And if one does believe in such things, it's imperative that we see it exactly as it is.

800 simply is not enough.

--

21/03/2007

News: Hong Kong's make-believe election

Democracy in China

Hong Kong's make-believe election
Mar 15th 2007 | HONG KONG
From The Economist print edition


Nobody doubts that Donald Tsang will be returned as chief executive. But China is under pressure to allow a more open contest next time

Get article background

THE people of Hong Kong were treated to a startling sight earlier this month: their Beijing-approved leader, who is up for re-election, was arguing it out live on television with a pro-democracy challenger seeking his job. Despite the appearance of a genuine contest, however, real democracy has not yet arrived.

The selection of a chief executive for Hong Kong is still a choreographed affair that will return China's man, Donald Tsang, with a big majority. The candidates may be pressing the flesh in housing estates, but the public has no direct say in the matter. Instead, the choice will be made on March 25th by a committee of 800 members, mainly pro-Beijing politicians and worthies chosen by business and professional groups that shun confrontation with the authorities in China.

Yet things are changing. To democrats' surprise, a new election committee chosen last December had just enough members of the right bent to enable a pro-democracy candidate—Alan Leong, a barrister and a member of the local mini-parliament known as the Legislative Council (LegCo)—to be nominated for the first time.

In the last two elections for chief executive there was no contest and, according to Mr Leong, the government in Beijing had not expected opposition this time either. Mr Tsang is now having to put on a show of electioneering. In the televised debate on March 1st with Mr Leong, he appeared uncomfortable and defensive. Mr Leong noted that the public had not been invited to the event; only members of the election committee were allowed in and the few pro-democracy protesters who burst into the venue were bundled out. Another debate was due to take place on March 15th with questions from the public. Mr Leong says the political landscape of Hong Kong has been changed for good; no chief executive could expect to be elected again without having to face the people.

The election comes at a crucial juncture in Hong Kong's post-colonial development. According to the Basic Law, Hong Kong's mini-constitution which was approved by China in 1990 and took effect when the British left in 1997, the territory's ultimate aim is to have universal suffrage. Many in Hong Kong had thought this could happen this year for the chief-executive election, and next year for the semi-democratic legislature.

But China's rulers decreed three years ago that Hong Kong would not be ready for democracy so soon. Pressure is now growing on Mr Tsang to set a target date. In the televised debate (seen in parts of the mainland), Mr Tsang avoided giving any such timetable. He says his government will issue a green paper later this year setting out ways of expanding democracy. Then, after three months of public discussion (he says he hopes to complete this by Christmas), the government will produce a single preferred option to submit to the authorities in Beijing. Mr Tsang says he will bow to the public will, but he says opinion polls show that 65% of Hong Kong people think they would not be ready for full democracy when chief-executive and legislative-council elections are held in 2012.

Mr Leong's Civic Party, which was formed last year, and other pro-democracy groups demand universal suffrage by then. Some democrats fear the government will use the public consultation in the same way the British-era government used a similar exercise in the late 1980s to delay reform. Anson Chan, who retired six years ago as chief of Hong Kong's civil service and enjoys huge popularity, has proposed a more gradual move to full democracy in 2016, but even her ideas have been received coolly in Beijing. She argues that Hong Kong is inherently unstable: at present there may be a feel-good factor thanks to the economic upturn of recent years, but the next slump could bring a groundswell of discontent unless there is quicker progress to democracy.

A big obstacle to any reform is LegCo, two-thirds of whose members have to support any political change. In 2005, pro-democracy members managed to block a package of limited government-inspired reforms, saying they wanted far more. But pro-business members, who tend to support China's stance, could block any attempt to change the current make-up, which reserves half the seats for business and professional groups. A major worry for them is that a fully democratic LegCo might demand more welfare spending and raise the cost of doing business.

Mr Tsang says Hong Kong is nowhere near finding consensus on reforming the legislature. But he says there are the makings of a deal over his job: instead of choosing the chief executive, the election committee could draw up a list of candidates to be voted on by the public.

Allowing the public its say may not give power to the democrats. Mr Tsang lacks charisma, but opinion polls suggest he would win a comfortable majority because of his experience—and his ability to get on with those overseers in Beijing.

10/03/2007

My Visit to the Dr. Sun Yat Sen Museum

Awaiting a Democratic Hong Kong

One of the last tasks I had to do before leaving Hong Kong was to go to the newly opened Dr. Sun Yat Sen Museum. Not only because he is the founding father of modern China, the museum is also located at the bottom of the street and area that I grew up on and my family has been for four generations. My great grandmother lived there, my grandmother and father lived there, and so did my mother and I. It was both political and personal.

My first feeling of going inside was how great it was that I could enter the building that I walked pass so often, and remember asking my grandmother what it was. Previously, it was a home of a rich man, but as long as I remember it was a Mormon temple of sorts. It was impressive no doubt. A mixture of Chinese and western architecture that is usually found in the old buildings in Hong Kong, the staircase was incredible as most old houses are, with some stained glass on the window.

The exhibitions were somewhat small -lots of historical knickknacks that are important but not always very interesting to look at but important all the same. As everyone, I know most of the facts of Dr. Sun's life. Born in China, lived in Honolulu, returned to China, exiled to Hong Kong and Macau where he set up a number of revolutionary groups until the colonial government also removed him. After that he went to the US and organized a number of uprisings that failed while abroad and finally succeeded in 1911 returning to China to be the leader of the Republic of China. He died in 1924 and China remained a democratic nation until the invasion of the Japanese followed by declarations of the PRC in 1949.

What I learnt in the museums was the Chinese ideals of human rights of food, shelter, and clothing did not come from Mao, but Dr. Sen. That he was kidnapped by the Qing dynasty in London, and through that became known as the Chinese Revolutionary abroad. After the fall of the Qing dynasty he was forced to succeed the title to the general whom than proclaimed himself emperor, which left China in another Warlord period and Dr. Sun Yat Sen again had to overthrow.

What I also didn't know was the reason he came to Hong Kong to study was because went into the family temple in his home village and smashed up the gods on the alter as a symbol of ending superstitious thought and was exiled from his village. That part of the reason he decided to make a revolt against the Qing dynasty instead of pushing for reform was the Sino-French war that the Imperial court lost.

But what struck me as the most interesting was during his time he spent in Hong Kong, he asked, (I am paraphrasing here) is that how can 4000 years of history in China leave the country less prosperous, organized and well run than Hong Kong with it's mere few decades?"

His conclusion was that Hong Kong was a government that was open to Science and the rest of the world. That it no longer followed the old superstitious ways. That although was a colony, it was run by a country with a democratic background. And those conclusions lead him to believe in a new and better China through democratic reforms and end of Imperialism.

What stuck me was in less than a century later we could still ask the same question. What is it about Hong Kong that makes us more modern, more prosperous, and more dynamic than China right now?

The answer is still that same. We have freedoms that those on the mainland don't have.

---
Address: 7 Castle Road, Mid-Levels, Hong Kong

Opening hours. Monday to Wednesday and Friday to Saturday: 10:00 am to 6:00 pm
Sundays and Public Holidays: 10:00 am to 7:00 pm
Christmas Eve and Chinese New Year Eve: 10am to 5pm
Closed: Thursday (except public holidays) and the first two days of Chinese New Year
FREE: Wednesdays and the anniversaries of Dr. Sun's birth (Nov 12th) and Death (12 March)

Enquiry 23676373

http://hk.drsunyatsen.museum

All the posts